discussion
[Top] [All Lists]

[Discussion] poll: WAD variables

To: discussion@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Discussion] poll: WAD variables
From: John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:17:51 -0500
I'm currently cleaning up the Web100 patch to try to get it pulled in to the kernel. The WAD (work-around) variables:

WAD_CwndAdjust
WAD_NoAI
WAD_MaxSsthresh
WAD_MaxBurst
WAD_IFQ

and sysctls:

net.ipv4.WAD_IFQ
net.ipv4.WAD_MaxBurst

are by design experimental and not necessarily appropriate for the general kernel. I'm curious if anyone uses these variables and would seriously miss them if they were gone.

I may be able to maintain an additional patch to keep these in if there is demand. Also, MaxSsthresh might be able to stay, as we may get Limited Slow-Start in the base kernel soon.

Thanks,
  -John

_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@xxxxxxxxxx
http://internal.web100.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Discussion] poll: WAD variables, John Heffner <=